Personal Injury Law Firm in Seattle Washington. Free case evaluation 206-335-3880
Loss of consortium is a legal term that refers to the deprivation of the benefits of a family relationship due to injuries caused by a negligent party. In personal injury law, it typically applies to the spouse or family member of an injured person who can claim damages for the loss of companionship, affection, and support. Seattle Loss of Consortium Attorneys At Oshan & Associates, believe it is essential to understand the nuances of loss of consortium claims, the statistics surrounding them, and how they relate to personal injury cases.
Loss of consortium refers to the loss of companionship, emotional support, and affection that one spouse or family member suffers due to the injuries sustained by another family member due to the negligence of a third party. The claims can be made by spouses, children, and sometimes parents, depending on the circumstances of the case. This type of claim is designed to compensate the injured party's family for the emotional and relational toll that the injury has taken on their lives.
Loss of consortium claims are rooted in the idea that the injured party is not the only victim in a personal injury case. While the injured person may suffer physical and emotional harm, their family members also endure significant pain and suffering due to changes in their relationships. To establish a loss of consortium claim, the following elements generally need to be proven:
Evan M. Oshan and his team are not afraid to go against powerful corporations or the government. With his ‘never say defeat’ spirit and his push to represent the best of his Clients' interests Evan M. Oshan has been called a warrior for justice. Evan Oshan has experience working with all types of personal injury claims in the state of Washington including but not limited to car accidents , bus accidents, truck accidents, and more.
Evan M. Oshan was quoted, featured and interviewed in hundreds of news publications worldwide including but not limited to: New York Post, TMZ, ABC, CBS, NBC, Washington Post, Fox, Inside Edition, The Seattle Times, Los Angeles Times, The Washington Times, CNBC, New York Post, CNN, New York Daily News, Metro UK, People, PBS and more.
Oshan & Associates, P.C. has consistently and effectively secured substantial international, national, and local media contracts, appearing in a plethora of media coverage pieces for high profile cases. Obtaining multiple gag order confidential settlements with hard line negotiation achieving success in settlements and favorable verdicts. No case is too small, every person matters and every case is unique and treated with the outmost respect.
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Kelsha Anderson
Excellent Lawyer
"Very good at what he does. Five stars isn't enough.."
(AVVO REVIEW)
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Mike L.
"Excellent Representation from Evan! As the old saying goes, there is the best and the rest. Evan is absolutely the Best! Evan helped me when no other attorney would. Seriously, too much to list in a review. If you are fortunate enough to have Evan as your attorney he will be your true advocate. You will be in great hands and can rest easy as he will perform professional work on your behalf that no other lawyer will. In my case, one of the ways he helped me is he hired multiple top shelf professionals each in their own field of study to interview me to provide expert testimony of my situation. That's just one of the many! I have been around quite a while, I have had lawyers represent me over the past decades that never did anything close to what Evan has done for me. Evan is a high level expert Super Lawyer and at the same time down to earth and easy to talk to. Evan is a wonderful caring person so a pleasure to work with. He will always have your best interest at heart. Evan is now my attorney for life. If you need representation, look no further. Do yourself a favor and give Evan a call!"
(GOOGLE REVIEW)
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Jim Hesketh
Top Attoreny
"I suffered injuries due to being hit by a car as a pedestrian. I was not getting a response for the pain and suffering claim from the drivers insurance company so I hired Evan Oshan. Evan was able to settle the claim which exceeded my expectations. To anyone who is looking for an attorney to represent them in a Personal Injury claim I highly recommend Evan. I am confident you will appreciate his expertise."
(AVVO REVIEW)
The following statistics illustrate the prevalence of personal injuries and the importance of loss of consortium claims:
1. Personal Injury Claims - According to the National Safety Council (NSC), in 2020, there were approximately 46.2 million injuries that required medical attention in the United States. Many of these injuries resulted from negligence, leading to potential loss of consortium claims by affected family members. - The American Bar Association (ABA) reports that personal injury claims, including loss of consortium, account for approximately 52% of all civil cases filed in U.S. courts.
2. Impact on Families - A survey conducted by the National Institute of Health (NIH) found that families with an injured member experienced a significant increase in emotional distress, with 60% of respondents reporting feelings of anxiety, depression, or isolation. - The CDC reports that injuries are a leading cause of disability in the U.S., affecting not only the injured party but also their families. Approximately 30% of families with a disabled member report a decline in overall family cohesion.
Understanding how loss of consortium claims apply in real-life scenarios can illuminate their importance. Here are a few hypothetical yet factual examples of loss of consortium cases:
Car Accident Scenario involving loss of consortium in Seattle with a King County Jury: John, a 35-year-old married man, was injured in a car accident caused by a distracted driver. He sustained severe injuries, including multiple fractures and a traumatic brain injury, resulting in long-term cognitive impairments and emotional distress. Loss of Consortium Claim: John's wife, Sarah, filed a loss of consortium claim against the at-fault driver. She argued that John's injuries significantly affected their marital relationship—leading to decreased intimacy, emotional connection, and shared activities. Sarah provided evidence of therapy sessions they attended together to cope with the changes in their relationship, as well as testimonies from friends and family about the strain on their marriage. Outcome: The court acknowledged the impact of John's injuries on their relationship and awarded Sarah compensation for her loss of consortium claim, recognizing the emotional and relational toll of John’s accident.
Workplace Injury Scenario involving loss of consortium in Bellevue with a King County Jury:: Emily, a 40-year-old mother of two, was injured in a workplace accident due to unsafe conditions. She suffered a severe back injury that required multiple surgeries and resulted in chronic pain, limiting her ability to care for her children and perform household duties. Loss of Consortium Claim: Emily's husband, Mark, filed a loss of consortium claim against Emily’s employer, stating that her injury affected their family dynamic. He detailed how he took on additional responsibilities, leading to physical and emotional exhaustion. Mark also noted the emotional strain on their children due to their mother's inability to participate in family activities. Outcome: The court ruled in favor of Mark, awarding damages for loss of consortium, recognizing the profound impact of Emily's injury on their family life.
Medical Malpractice Scenario involving loss of consortium in Kirkland with a King County Jury:: Lisa, a 50-year-old woman, underwent surgery that was performed negligently, leading to severe post-operative complications and permanent disability. Her husband, David, witnessed the decline in Lisa's health and the emotional toll it took on her. Loss of Consortium Claim: David filed a loss of consortium claim against the medical provider, citing the loss of emotional support and companionship due to Lisa's ongoing health issues. He explained how their relationship changed, with Lisa becoming withdrawn and unable to engage in activities they once enjoyed together. Outcome: The court found in favor of David, emphasizing the emotional and relational losses he suffered due to Lisa's medical negligence.
Filing a loss of consortium claim involves several steps, which can vary by state. Here’s a general outline of the process:
Individuals seeking to file a loss of consortium claim should consult an experienced Seattle personal injury attorney. An attorney can help assess the validity of the claim, gather necessary evidence, and guide the claimant through the legal process.
The claimant must gather evidence demonstrating the impact of the injury on their relationship. This evidence may include:
Once sufficient evidence is collected, the attorney will file a claim with the appropriate court. The claim should outline the relationship between the parties, the nature of the injury, and the specific ways the injury has impacted the relationship.
After filing the claim, Discovery and negotiations may begin with the at-fault party or their insurance company. Many loss of consortium claims are settled out of court, although if a fair settlement cannot be reached, the case may proceed to trial.
If the case goes to trial, both parties will present their arguments and evidence before a judge or jury. The court will then determine whether the loss of consortium claim is valid and the appropriate amount of damages to award.
While loss of consortium claims can provide much-needed compensation for affected family members, they also come with challenges:
Demonstrating the emotional impact of an injury on a relationship can be difficult. Courts require concrete evidence, which may involve sensitive discussions about the family's emotional state and dynamics.
Laws regarding loss of consortium claims vary by state, affecting who can file a claim and what damages are recoverable. Some states may have stricter requirements, making it essential to consult an attorney familiar with local laws.
Insurance companies may resist loss of consortium claims, arguing that the relationship has not been significantly impacted. Negotiating a fair settlement may require persistence and strong evidence.
Damages awarded in loss of consortium claims can vary significantly based on the jurisdiction and the specifics of the case. They may include:
These damages cover quantifiable financial losses resulting from the injured party's condition. This may include:
Non-economic damages compensate for the intangible aspects of loss of consortium, including:
Loss of consortium claims play a crucial role in the landscape of personal injury law, acknowledging the profound impact that an injury can have on family relationships. Understanding the legal basis, statistics, and examples of loss of consortium is essential for individuals and families facing the consequences of negligence. At Oshan & Associates, we are committed to helping victims of personal injury and their families navigate the complexities of the legal system. If you or a loved one has been affected by an injury and you believe you may have a loss of consortium claim, we encourage you to reach out for a consultation.
Our experienced attorneys are here to guide you through the process and fight for the compensation you deserve, ensuring that the emotional, relational, and financial impacts of an injury are addressed. Together, we can seek justice and support your family during this challenging time. Your well-being and the preservation of your family relationships are our top priorities. Contact Oshan & Associates today to learn more about how we can help you.
Seattle Personal Injury Lawyers serving King County, Washington since 2000. Seattle Personal injury practice areas include but not limited to the following:
Certain Personal Injury cases which we take nation-wide. National Personal Injury practice areas include but not limited to the following:
